A North Dakota jury has begun deliberating on whether Greenpeace defamed a pipeline company and disrupted its controversial ...

The environmental groups is being sued over anti-pipeline protests nearly a decade ago. What’s decided here could have wide ...

Energy Transfer has taken Greenpeace to trial over claims that the environmental group incited illegal acts by protesters in North Dakota that cost the company millions of dollars in alleged property ...

Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the Standing Rock Sioux ...

The company cites the protests as the reason for a five-month delay in the pipeline’s completion, forcing it to miss a Jan. 1 ...

The environmental group, battling a multimillion-dollar lawsuit over protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, told the North Dakota Supreme Court it can’t get a fair trial.

Greenpeace criticizes the lawsuit as an example of corporations abusing the legal system to go after critics. A spokesperson ...

Closing arguments are scheduled to begin on Monday in a pipeline company's lawsuit against Greenpeace, a case the ...

The owners of the Dakota Access Pipeline allege Greenpeace masterminded the raucous protests in 2016 and 2017 against the ...

A North Dakota jury has begun deliberating on whether Greenpeace defamed the Energy Transfer pipeline company and disrupted ...

Cox attributed between $265 million and $340 million in damages to Greenpeace. He said the jury should not only hold ...

The $300 million trial between Dakota Access Pipeline developer and Greenpeace reached the halfway mark on Monday as the ...