Greenpeace used malicious and deceptive tactics to disrupt the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline and keep it from going ...
Energy Transfer has taken Greenpeace to trial over claims that the environmental group incited illegal acts by protesters in ...
A jury of nine heard closing arguments Monday in the civil trial between Energy Transfer and Greenpeace over the Dakota Access Pipeline, taking up deliberations after ...
Greenpeace criticizes the lawsuit as an example of corporations abusing the legal system to go after critics. A spokesperson ...
The environmental groups is being sued over anti-pipeline protests nearly a decade ago. What’s decided here could have wide ranging impacts on protest in the US.
Though Central ND News promises to "fill the void in community news after years of decline in local reporting by legacy media ...
A North Dakota jury has begun deliberating on whether Greenpeace defamed the Energy Transfer pipeline company and disrupted ...
It faces a reckoning in North Dakota. A crew member of the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior in 2002.Credit...Paul McErlane/Reuters Supported by By Karen Zraick Karen Zraick will be in the courtroom ...
(The Center Square) – Eight years after the completion of the Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) and accompanying protests at the ...
A former Greenpeace employee who trained demonstrators during the Dakota Access Pipeline protests told jurors Tuesday that he ...
Cox attributed between $265 million and $340 million in damages to Greenpeace. He said the jury should not only hold ...