Greenpeace used malicious and deceptive tactics to disrupt the controversial Dakota Access Pipeline and keep it from going ...

Energy Transfer has taken Greenpeace to trial over claims that the environmental group incited illegal acts by protesters in ...

Greenpeace criticizes the lawsuit as an example of corporations abusing the legal system to go after critics. A spokesperson ...

The environmental groups is being sued over anti-pipeline protests nearly a decade ago. What’s decided here could have wide ranging impacts on protest in the US.

The North Dakota Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a petition by Greenpeace to move its legal battle with Energy Transfer out ...

It faces a reckoning in North Dakota. A crew member of the Greenpeace ship Rainbow Warrior in 2002.Credit...Paul McErlane/Reuters Supported by By Karen Zraick Karen Zraick will be in the courtroom ...

MANDAN, N.D. (AP) — An attorney for a Texas pipeline company said Feb. 26 at trial that he will prove various Greenpeace ...

Exterior of the Morton County Courthouse in Mandan on Feb. 27, 2025. (Michael Achterling/North Dakota Monitor)MANDAN, N.D. (North Dakota Monitor) — Greenpeace has asked the North Dakota Supreme Court ...

Energy Transfer has taken Greenpeace to trial over claims that the environmental group incited illegal acts by protesters in North Dakota that cost the company millions of dollars in alleged ...

The North Dakota Supreme Court on Wednesday denied a petition by Greenpeace to move its legal battle with Energy Transfer out of Morton County. Attorneys for Greenpeace argued that the jury in the ...