Justice Samuel Alito's dissent was a platform to vent about his views of judicial overreach — while engaging in some himself.
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in rejecting the Trump administration's request to cancel the foreign aid money from USAID.
Justice Alito slams the Supreme Court’s 5-4 ruling allowing $2B in foreign aid payments, calling it unchecked judicial power against Trump’s spending freeze.
Constitutional lawyer Alan Dershowitz said Wednesday evening that Supreme Court Associate Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent in ...
23 小时on MSNOpinion
The key to understanding this morning’s Supreme Court ruling unfreezing American foreign aid is that two different rulings ...
A divided US Supreme Court dealt a blow to President Donald Trump’s foreign-aid freeze, reinstating a lower court order that ...
Justice Samuel Alito wrote Wednesday that he is “stunned” by the majority’s failure to call out a lower court’s “judicial ...
A day after getting a boost from the Supreme Court, U.S. foreign aid contractors and grant recipients go before a federal ...
Chief Justice Roberts and Amy Coney Barrett joined three liberal justices in the decision, illustrating a rare ...
In a significant legal decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 against the Trump administration, ordering the release of ...
Washington — The Supreme Court on Wednesday declined to halt a lower court order that required the Trump administration to unfreeze nearly $2 billion in foreign-aid funding, clearing the way for the ...
21 小时on MSN
WASHINGTON (AP) — A sharply divided Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected a Trump administration push to rebuke a federal judge who imposed a quick deadline to release billions of dollars in foreign aid ...
一些您可能无法访问的结果已被隐去。
显示无法访问的结果